Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse and systematise the most recent normative experiences that, within a comparative panorama that is still inevitably fragmented, can be traced back to a "dualistic" conception of technology in relation to law, on the one hand, and to an idea of law and regulation as 'immersive' with regard totechnology, on the other hand. Artificial intelligence-based systems in the context of the exercise of public functions has been identified as the most paradigmatic example of this trend. The adaptation of existing regulatory tools can play a decisive function in order to ensure a physiological integration of the digital and technological architecture into the pre-existing constitutional matrix, via the enactment of r such as regulatory sandboxes and algorithmic impact assessment tools.

Keywords: Comparative law; Artificial intelligence; Regulatory sandbox; Experimental legislation; Law and technology.